Klacht: Three months old insured damage is still unfixed. Merry Christmas!

H Alcharif op 29 november 2017 over Aegon in de categorie Verzekering

Nieuwe klacht
In behandeling
Klacht opgelost
Klacht afgesloten
Aegon is op de hoogte gebracht van deze klacht
Wacht op reactie
Bedrijf Aegon
Categorie Verzekering
Status Nieuwe klacht
Datum 29 november 2017

Samenvatting wordt geladen...

Mijn Klacht:

In September 13, 2017, I reported the damage number 7854076, concerning a damaged floor. Client service agent requested the source of the damage to be repaired before fixing the damage.
Following complicated process, and a mistake made by the house company agent who intentionally doesn\’t speak English (According to him); I was able to fix the main damage below the front door, and I reported this by email formally to Aegon in October 6, 2017.
In September 25, 2017, following a contact I made myself with Aegon representative through whatsapp, Aegon agent sent me the letter with the reference number 7854076, Date: September 25, 2017. My whatsapp record documents that the agent referred to it as an old letter, but the date on the letter shows that the letter was issued the same day, September 25, 2017.
Their requests, including detailed description and video documentation was sent immediately following receiving the letter.
In November 7, 2017, and again following contacting Aegon client service agent through whatsaap, Mr Eric sent me Aegon letter of the reference number 7854076, Date: October 30, 2017, 8 days following the issuing date. Requesting more information and purchase notes of one year old, and information about warranty, claiming that they are willing to handle the damage swiftly according to my wish!. I even called Aegon agent Mr Hank-Jan, and his colleague, and I understood that their job is to reduce any benefit I may get from my insurance, either according to the old notes, or by partly repairing the floor disregarding the color and quality variations.
My laminate floor have costed me 1400 Euro which was part of my GKB loan. I am still paying for it until now. It is important to be very well structured because it is essential part of my prospective dance psycho-therapy clinic. It is hard to document all the costs I made one year ago, and the costs cannot be calculated based on the purchase nots only. There is still the installation and the finishing costs, and It is apparently clear, and well evidenced, that the delay of handling this request is intentional following my strict critical notes about Aegon customer service and the damage claims department.
This prolonged procedure comes against all known insurance standards as you all certainly know. I am assuming that Aegon agents are doing their best to prolong the process and reduce any benefits I may receive from this insurance, instead of reimbursing me for their prolonged processing period. The consequences of two months of disability having a normal life at home! And delaying a professional project, cannot be calculated based on a one year old purchase notes!

Gewenste Oplossing:

The concept of insurance is certainly not to let the insured client wait and answer questions for two month!. A well respected insurance company should intervene and show up from the first day! week! Month!!! Aegon didn\'t send any expert, although I requested this from the very first contact.
I already submitted complain through Aegon website, and by email. I am still dissatisfied about the process. I am unable to good clean my home for three months now. And this delay came with negative impacts on my daily life activity, health, and prospective project.
This is an installed laminate floor, not a TV or cell phone. The assessment of damage must be conducted by a specialized company such as praxis or Ikea, and certainly not by Aegon agents whom obsessed with m2s and requesting information! I suggested the lowest available offer in the market - IKEA - to make the assessment and repair the damage. Aegon agents are still acting not only against all known insurance standards, but also against their own schadewijzer policy that the company already issued and specify!.

Bericht van Robin van Klacht.nl

8 jaren geleden - Ik heb een bericht op Twitter geplaatst over deze klacht over Aegon

Bericht van Robin van Klacht.nl

8 jaren geleden - Ik heb een bericht op Twitter geplaatst dat deze klacht over Aegon nog niet in behandeling is genomen.

Reactie van de melder van de klacht

8 jaren geleden - published documentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bf3RkW7iw6s

Reactie van de melder van de klacht

8 jaren geleden - rom: H Alcharif to: Monique Erven cc: "[email protected]" , Welkom , [email protected] date: 7 December 2017 at 17:29 subject: Re: terugkoppeling camera inspectie Elsland 1012 Wijchen mailed-by: gmail.com Beste Madam Erven; Thanks for your kind letter. My name is H Alcharif, not Eulink. I found this name Eulink on the attached invoice which I received from Talis. I assume that he is the same employee who came and conducted the initial check. I therefore find myself obliged to take precautions in this concern. The problem about Mr Eulink is not just that he misdiagnosed the damage below the front door, but additionally his intentional tendency not to speak English even though he knows the language (according to him) during my formal phone call with Talis. He moreover was eager to tell me that it is my problem not to speak Dutch!. He was even using difficult Dutch accent to make it more difficult for me to understand him. However, I understood him perfectly. I am sorry to say it; but I can only interpret such a behavior in terms of discrimination and cognitive bigotry, and I already included this in his evaluation form that I received from Talis following the repairing process. In conclusion, I formally inform you that it should not be Mr Eulink to request or decide this camera inspection. I find myself obligated to postponed this appointment and consult both my contact, and my lawer, about Mr Eulink intentions. Finally; Mr Eulink was unable to see the attached well documented damage in reality; what am I supposed therefore to expect from his current and upcoming requests. Thanks in advance for your kind understanding, With all due respect, H Alcharif 2017-12-07 16:05 GMT+01:00 Monique Erven : Beste heer Eulink, Door de afwezigheid en door ziekte van diverse mensen op ons kantoor heeft het de terugkoppeling langer geduurd dan gewenst is. Onze excuses daarvoor. De camera inspectie staat ingepland op dinsdag 12 december a.s., het duurt circa 2 á 3 dagen voor wij een terugkoppeling kunnen geven over de bevindingen nadat deze is uitgevoerd. Hopende u hiermee voldoende te hebben geïnformeerd, Met vriendelijke groet, Monique Erven

Reactie van de melder van de klacht

8 jaren geleden - from: H Alcharif to: [email protected] cc: [email protected], [email protected], Monique Erven , Welkom , [email protected] date: 11 December 2017 at 22:07 subject: Re: Schnr.: 7854076-23774 Polnr.: 711509118 Dosnr.: 1778766400 mailed-by: gmail.com Madam/Mr the representative of CED Nederlands; First of all I must draw your attention to an essential mistake I found in the file I received form you. The policy number!. Please be advised that my policy number is: 711509117, not 711509118. With all due respect to your well respected institution in Rotterdam, I stress that I requested a different institution located in Gelderland to assess and conduct the repairing works. I therefore would ask you kindly provide me a with copy of the order that you received from Aegon to arrange for this appointment. As you may notice in the letter you sent yourself; The damage was reported in September 13, 2017. Your institution should have been notified up to 13 days following my initial report according the schadewizer policy that I agreed with Aegon on, and this is what I personally asked for myself in my very first contact with the insurance company. The noneprofissionality in handling this case by Aegon damage claims team makes it take over two months for unexplained reasons. Your letter date is December 8, 2017. I find this is very unacceptable. I can only interpret Aegon teams behavior in terms of discrimination and personal insult. The delay of handling this damage came with negative impacts on my daily life activity, health, and prospective professional project. Your institution is specialized in handling vocational materialistic damages. You unfortunately do not have the expertise to assess the secondary but more serious damages that occurred as result of this prolonged unexplained delay period, neither the expertise to even understand medical reports. I therefore find myself obligated to decline your offer, and go for more efficient way to appropriately handle it. Finally, it is so unfortunate for such simple case, to be my first youtube uploaded document: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bf3RkW7iw6s With my kind regards, H Alcharif 2017-12-08 7:39 GMT+01:00 : Geachte relatie, In bijlage treft u een schrijven aan inzake onderstaand dossier. Dossiergegevens: ------------------------------ Dossiernummer CED : 1778766400 Schadenummer : 7854076-23774 Polisnummer : 711509118 Schadedatum : 13-09-2017 Object : INBOEDEL Met vriendelijke groet, CED Nederland

Alle klachten die gemeld zijn door
💡

Tip van onze consumentenexpert

Als consument in Nederland heeft u sterke rechten. Bij klachten kunt u de interne klachtenprocedure doorlopen, naar de Geschillencommissie of het Kifid stappen, of advies vragen bij ConsuWijzer.

Bron: ConsuWijzer / ACM